Abstract: The provisions of article 71 of the company without the consent of the other shareholders to shareholders other than the transfer of equity that belongs to the disciplinary power is limited, should from the social policy perspective have no right to dispose of contract law in expansion. It should be regarded as the right of disposition. At the same time combined with business contract judicial explanation, the provisions of article 3 of infringement of priority right of shareholders equity transfer contract are effective theoretical basis for relocation. On the right to dispose of the premise, the provisions of the applicable law are suitable for the “good faith” so as to provide reasonable reference for equity transfer in the settlement of the dispute.

Key words: shareholders preemptive right, equity transfer, have no right to dispose of, equity in good

摘要： 公司法第71条规定的未经其他股东同意向股东以外的人转让股权，属于处分权能受到限制的情况，应从社会政策角度考量对合同法中的无权处分作扩张解释，将其视为无权处分之一种。同时结合买卖合同司法解释第3条的规定，重新定位侵犯股东优先购买权的股权转让合同有效的理论基础。在无权处分的前提下，类推适用物权法关于“善意取得”的规定，以期为司法实践中股权转让纠纷的解决提供合理借鉴。

关键词: 股东优先购买权, 股权转让, 无权处分, 股权善意取得