国内外叹词意义研究现状述评

重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 97-104.

国内外叹词意义研究现状述评

黄弋桓1，黄兰堞2

1.重庆交通大学外国语学院，重庆 400074；2.桂林航天工业学院外语外贸学院，广西桂林 541004

收稿日期:2021-08-30 修回日期:2021-09-22 出版日期:2022-05-18 发布日期:2022-05-18
作者简介:黄弋桓，女，重庆交通大学外国语学院副教授，博士；黄兰堞，女，桂林航天工业学院外语外贸学院副教授。
基金资助:
重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究项目“类型学视域下多式综合语的情意研究”（20SKGH082）；重庆市高等教育教学改革研究项目“工程翻译专业汉语类课程整体优化与教学内容改革研究与实践”（213182）

Review on the Studies of Interjection Meanings at Home and Abroad

HUANG Yihuan1, HUNAG Landie2

1.School of Foreign Languages, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China； 2.School of Foreign Language and International Business, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, 〖DW2〗Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China

Received:2021-08-30 Revised:2021-09-22 Online:2022-05-18 Published:2022-05-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 国内外传统研究认为叹词是纯粹的情感词，包含情感意义或表达说话人当下的心理状态。概念论者根据NSM理论，认为叹词具有指示性和规约性两大特点，可以传递概念内容，包含概念意义。关联论者根据关联理论，认为叹词包含程序意义，可以构建较高层次显义，也可以激活命题态度或态度描述。跨语言研究尤其是关于多式综合语的研究表明叹词还包含文化意义。对于叹词意义的多重认识有助于更加深入地理解该语言现象。

关键词: 叹词, 情感意义, 概念意义, 程序意义, 文化意义

Abstract: Traditional studies believe interjections are purely emotional words, which contain emotional meaning or express the current mental state of the speaker. Conceptual theorists, based on NSM theory, hold that interjections are of indexicality and conventionality, and can convey conceptual content and contain conceptual meaning. Relevance theorists, based on relevance theory, believe that interjections contain procedural meaning, they can construct higherlevel explicature and can also activate propositional attitude or attitude description. Crosslanguage studies, especially those on polysynthetic languages, show that interjections also contain cultural meaning. Understanding the meanings of interjections is helpful for a deeper understanding of this linguistic phenomenon.

Key words: interjections, emotional meaning, conceptual meaning, procedural meaning, cultural meaning

黄弋桓1，黄兰堞2. 国内外叹词意义研究现状述评[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22(3): 97-104.

HUANG Yihuan1, HUNAG Landie2. Review on the Studies of Interjection Meanings at Home and Abroad[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University Social Sciences Edition, 2022, 22(3): 97-104.

参考文献

［1］叶斯柏森 O.语法哲学［M］.何勇,译.北京:语文出版社,1988:105.
［2］BLOOMFIELD L.Language［M］.Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2001.
［3］AMEKA F.Interjections:the universal yet neglected part of speech［J］.Journal of pragmatics,1992,18(2/3):101-118.
［4］WIERZBICKA A.The semantics of interjection［J］.Journal of pragmatics,1992,18(2/3):159-192.
［5］PADILLA CRUZ M.Might interjections encode concepts More questions than answers［J］.Lodz papers in pragmatics,2009,5(2):241-270.
［6］刘丹青.实词的叹词化和叹词的去叹词化［J］.汉语学习,2012,33(3):3-13.
［7］罗宾斯.简明语言学史［M］.许德宝,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1997.
［8］QUIRK R,GREENBAUM S,LEECH G,et al.A grammar of contemporary English［M］.London:Longman,1972:358.
［9］GOFFMAN E.Response cries［M］// GOFFMAN E.Forms of talk.Philadelphia:University of pennsylvania Press,1981.
［10］EASTMAN C M.Swahili interjections:blurring languageuse/gestureuse boundaries［J］.Journal of pragmatics,1992,18(2/3):273-287.
［11］马建忠.马氏文通［M］.北京:商务印书馆,1983:381.
［12］黎锦熙.新著国语文法［M］.北京:商务印书馆,1947:337.
［13］高名凯.汉语语法论［M］.北京:商务印书馆,1986:547.
［14］刘宁生.叹词研究［J］.南京师大学报(社会科学版),1987,33(3):49-55.
［15］AMEKA F K,WILKINS D P.Interjections［M］//STMAN JO,VERSCHUEREN J.Handbook of pragmatics.Amsterdam:John Benjamins,2006.
［16］马清华.论叹词形义关系的原始性［J］.语言科学,2011,10(5):482-496.
［17］郭攀,夏凤梅.汉语叹词范围之历层观［J］.郧阳师范高等专科学校学报,2015,36(1):60-65.
［18］郭攀.“情理组配”表述模式及相关叹词、语气词方面的问题［J］.华中学术,2018,10(4):188-195.
［19］WIERZBICKA A.Crosscultural pragmatics:the semantics of human interaction［M］.Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter,2003:291.
［20］WILKINS D P.Interjections as deictics［J］.Journal of pragmatics,1992,18(2/3):119-158
［21］WILKINS D P.Expanding the traditional category of deictic elements:interjections as deictics［M］//DUCHAN J F,BRUDER G A,HEWITT L E.Deixis in narrative:a cognitive science perspective. New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,1995.
［22］SCHOURUP L.Rethinking well［J］.Journal of pragmatics,2001,33(7):1025-1060.
［23］CLARK H H,FOX TREE J E.Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking［J］.Cognition,2002,84(1):73-111.
［24］EVNAS N.“Wanjh! Bonj! Nja!”:sequential organization and social deixis in Mayali interjections［J］.Journal of pragmatics,1992,18(2/3):225-244.
［25］郭锐.现代汉语词类研究［M］.北京:商务印书馆,2002:237.
［26］刘丹青.叹词的本质:代句词［J］.世界汉语教学,2011,25(2):147-158.
［27］WHARTON T.Interjections,language and the “showing”/“saying” continuum［J］.Pragmatics and cognition,2003,11(1):173-215.
［28］WALASZEWSKA E.What to do with response cries in relevance theory［M］// MIODUSZEWSKA E.Relevance studies in Poland.Warsaw:University of Warsaw,2004:119-129.
［29］FRASER B.On the conceptualprocedural distinction［J］.Style,2006,40(1/2):24-32.
［30］FRASER B.An account of discourse markers［J］.International review of pragmatics,2009,1(2):293-320.
［31］WHARTON T.That bloody soandso has retired:expressives revisited［J］.Lingua,2016,175:20-35.
［32］WILSON D.The conceptualprocedural distinction:past,presen and future［M］//ESCANDELLVIDAL V,LEONETTI M,AHERN A.Procedural meaning:problems and perspectives.Bingley:Emerald,2011:3-31
［33］陆镜光.汉语方言中的指示叹词［J］.语言科学,2005,4(6):88-95.
［34］GORLE D L.From words and sentences to interjections:the anatomy of exclamations in Peirce and Wittgenstein［J］.Semiotica,2015，2015(205):37-86.
［35］KOCKELMAN P.The meanings of interjections in Qeqchi Maya:from emotive reaction to social and discursive action［J］.Current anthropology,2003,44(4):467-490.
［36］周国光.叹词的语法功能、语义功能及其定位［J］.语言科学,2016,15(3):225-233.
［37］AIJMER K.Interjections in a contrastive perspective［M］// WEIGAND E.Emotion in dialogic interaction:advances in the complex.Philadelphia:John Benjamins,2004:99-120.
［38］TOSKA B.Linguistically interconnecting cultures［J］.Redefining community in intercultural context,2012,1(1):127-131.
［39］王力.中国现代语法［M］.北京:商务印书馆,1985:326,333.
［40］ LEECH G,MARGARET D,ROBERT H.English grammar for today:a new introduction［M］.London:The Macmillan Press,1982:53.
［41］ NORRICK N R.Interjections as pragmatic markers［J］.Journal of pragmatics,2009,41(5):866-891.
［42］黄弋桓,黄兰堞.叹词的概念意义与程序意义［J］.重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(2):107-112.

[1]	黄弋桓1，黄兰堞2. 叹词的概念意义与程序意义[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 20(2): 107-112.
[2]	余元玲. 论翻译中的映象再现[J]. , 2003, 3(03): 50-50.