重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 91-103.

• 语言学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

《华尔街日报》中华为企业形象的 “话语—历史”分析

张鹏1,侯福莉2   

  1. 1.西华大学 外国语学院,成都 610039;2.中国传媒大学 外国语言文化学院,北京 100024
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-01 修回日期:2023-03-07 出版日期:2023-07-18 发布日期:2023-07-18
  • 作者简介:张鹏,男,西华大学外国语学院教师,硕士;侯福莉,女,中国传媒大学外国语言文化学院教授,博士。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“类型学视野下的汉语主观化‘左移’现象研究”(17XYY019);四川省教育厅项目“从翻译世界到翻译中国转变的复合型翻译人才培养模式研究”(JG2021-930)

A DiscourseHistorical Approach to Media Portrayal of Huaweis Corporate Image in The Wall Street Journal

ZHANG Peng1, HOU Fuli2   

  1. [1]黄河,周骁.超越主权:跨国公司对国际政治经济秩序的影响与重塑[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022,39(1):107-120. [2]高立胜.企业形象[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1994:5. [3]陈薇.国家形象建构与传媒话语的权力场:香港商业报纸对中国形象建构的实证研究[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2020:19-20. [4]VAN DIJK T A.作为话语的新闻[M].曾庆香,译.北京:华夏出版社,2003:12. [5]FAIRCLOUGH N.Media discourse[M].London & New York:Bloomsbury Academic,2011:65. [6]PERRINO S.Narrating authenticity in northern Italian historical cafes[J].Language & communication,2015,40(1):82-91. [7]KOHLER G.“Gregory Dry”:parody and the morality of brand[J]. Language in society,2017,46(5): 719-737. [8]GIANNONI D S.An investigation of value claims in academic and corporate “About us” texts[J].Applied linguistics,2018,39(3):328-351. [9]TENCA E.Remediating corporate communication through the web:the case of about us sections in companies global websites[J].ESP todayjournal of English for specific purposes at tertiary level,2018,6(1):84-106. [10]BONDI M.The future in reports prediction,commitment and legitimization in CSR[J].Pragmatics and society,2016,7(1):57-81. [11]FUOLI M.Building a trustworthy corporate identity:a corpusbased analysis of stance in annual and corporate social responsibility reports[J].Applied linguistics,2018,39(6):846-885. [12]KOCAHELVACI Z C.Discursive strategies in corporate image building of Monsanto[J].Australian review of applied linguistics,2017,40(3):247-279. [13]乌楠,张敬源.中美企业机构身份的话语建构策略[J].现代外语,2019,42(2):220-230. [14]乌楠,张敬源.主题互文视域下企业年报语篇的协变量结构与企业身份建构[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2020,43(4):78-86. [15]史兴松,程霞.基于语料库的中美银行企业身份话语研究[J].现代外语,2021,44(2):170-182. [16]赵永刚.媒体并购话语中的中国企业形象对比研究:一项语料库辅助的话语—历史分析[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2021,44(1):62-70. [17]胡开宝,盛丹丹.《可持续发展报告》英译本中的华为公司形象研究:一项基于语料库的研究[J].外国语(上海外国语大学学报),2020,43(6):94-106. [18]徐,自正权.基于语料库的企业外宣翻译与企业形象语义构建研究[J].外语学刊,2020(1):93-101. [19]邓鹂鸣,周韵.基于互文策略的中外企业语用身份构建研究:以社会责任报告为例[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,42(4):59-67. [20]孙秀丽,王敏,贺薪颖.态度系统视域下能源企业的语用身份建构研究[J].中国石油大学学报(社会科学版),2020,36(5):27-33. [21]吕金妹,詹全旺.危机语境中企业网络身份的构建路径及人际语用联动机制[J].现代外语,2020,43(4):489-502. [22]刘姝昕.生态语言学:阿里巴巴致股东信的身份构建研究[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,36(3):19-27. [23]苗兴伟,李柯.再语境化视角下企业生态身份的话语建构[J].外语教学,2021,42(2):1-6. [24]WODAK R,MEYER M.Methods of critical discourse analysis[M].2nd ed.Beijing:Peking University Press,2014. [25]WODA K R.Critical discourse analysis,discoursehistorical approach[M]//TRACY K,LLIE C, SANDEL T.The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction.New York:John Wiley & Sons,Inc.,2015:1-14. [26]杨敏,侍怡君.中美贸易战中美方“合法化”话语建构:基于语料库的话语—历史分析[J].外语研究,2021,38(3):7-13. [27]VAN LEEUWEN T.Discourse and practice:new tools for critical discourse analysis[M].New York:Oxford University Press,2008. [28]REISIGL M.Argumentation analysis and the discoursehistorical approach:a methodological framework[M]//HART C,CAP P.Contemporary critical studies.London:Bloomsbury,2014:67-96. [29]陈志恒,马学礼.美国“反国家资本主义”思潮:缘起、政策实践及战略意图[J].国外社会科学,2015(5):77-85. [30]刘皓琰.新帝国主义的数字殖民:从网络族群与注意力时间谈起[J].国外理论动态,2020(3):46-54. [31]刘皓琰.当代左翼数字殖民主义理论评介[J].当代世界与社会主义,2021,42(2):112-117. A DiscourseHistorical Approach to Media Portrayal of Huaweis Corporate Image in The Wall Street Journal ZHANG Peng1, HOU Fuli2 (1.School of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Xihua University, Chengdu, 610039, China; 2.School of Foreign Studies, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, China
  • Received:2023-02-01 Revised:2023-03-07 Online:2023-07-18 Published:2023-07-18

摘要: 以Ruth Wodak的“话语—历史”法为主要理论框架,并辅以Van Leeuwen的社会行为者表征理论,分析2016—2021年美国主流新闻媒体《华尔街日报》的相关新闻语料,研究美国主流新闻媒体如何刻画华为的他塑企业形象。新闻话题历经从普遍积极到普遍消极的历时演变;新闻话语刻意将各类社会行为者划分为“群内成员”与“群外成员”,形成敌我阵营;新闻报道通过使用各种话语策略,将华为刻画为“新兴的科技巨头”“‘激进的’行业竞争者”“国有/国控的‘傀儡’”和“巨大威胁”四类形象。最后,批评美国媒体及主流舆论界对中国及中国企业的另类误读。无论是国家还是企业,在维持自塑形象的同时,更应高度重视媒体刻画的他塑形象。

关键词: “话语—历史”法;社会行为者表征理论;企业形象;《华尔街日报》

Abstract: This paper investigates how The Wall Street Journal, the US mainstream news media, portrays Huaweis corporate image. By adopting Ruth Wodaks DiscourseHistorical Approach (DHA) as the major theory and Van Leeuwens theory of representing social actors as the supplementary one, the paper analyzes the news reports from 2016 to 2021. The results indicate that ⅰ) theres a diachronic change in the news topics, from generally positive ones to generally negative ones; ⅱ) in the news discourse, “ingroups” and “outgroups” are distinguished to create tension between “Us” and “Them”; ⅲ) The Wall Street Journal uses different discursive strategies to portray Huawei as “emerging tech giant” “radical competitor” “stateowned/controlled company” “big threat”. The paper criticizes the alternative understandings of China and the Chinese company from the US mainstream news media and public opinions. The results also indicate that it is significant for a country and a company to focus on the “otherportrayal” of their images while maintaining positive “selfportrayal” of their images.

Key words: discoursehistorical approach; theory of representing social actors; corporate image; The Wall Street Journal