›› 2014, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (2): 38-41.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on the Types of Illegal Evidence in Administrative Litigation

TAO Lei   

  1. (Law School,Huaqiao University,Quanzhou, Fujian 362021,China)
  • Received:2013-11-27 Online:2014-04-30 Published:2016-04-06

论行政诉讼非法证据类型

陶磊   

  1. 华侨大学 法学院,福建 泉州 362021
  • 作者简介:陶磊(1989-),男,湖北襄阳市人,华侨大学法学院2012级诉讼法学硕士生,研究方向:民事诉讼法。

Abstract: The illegal evidence exclusionary rule was first established and developed to a relatively complete system in the United States,Chinas illegal evidence exclusion rules discussion only stay in the theoretical stage in a very long time,but in 2012,Criminal Procedure Law adopted and established the rules of evidence from theory into practice,this also provides a good reference of exclusionary rule for illegal evidence in administrative litigation. Currently,the administrative procedure law is in the modification period,based on the existing legal norms,study on the types and the judgment standard of illegal evidence in administrative litigation is necessary.

Key words: administrative litigation, types of illegal evidence, judgment standard

摘要: 非法证据排除规则最早在美国确立并得到发展,形成一套比较完整的体系。我国对非法证据排除规则的探讨很长时期仅停留在理论阶段,2012年《刑事诉讼法》修改中采纳并确立这一证据规则,使其从理论探讨变为实践,也为行政诉讼非法证据排除规则的探讨提供了很好的借鉴。目前,行政诉讼法正处于修改时期,以现有的法律规范为基础探讨行政诉讼非法证据的类型及其判断标准显得尤为必要。

关键词: 行政诉讼, 非法证据类型, 判断标准