Abstract: Taking the theory of metaphtonymy proposed by Goossens as well as the illustration on the interaction between metaphor and metonymy raised by Ruiz de Mendoza and Velasco as the theoretic framework, specific cases representative of the idioms signifying the emotion of “anger” are analyzed. The results not only fully demonstrate the complexity of cognitive mechanisms underlying idioms, but also briefly describe and clearly reveal the patterns on how metaphor and metonymy work together. It further proves the fact that metaphor and metonymy, which are closely associated conceptually, altogether determine the way ordinary people think, and they are important components of conceptual system in peoples head. Metonymy, which provides metaphor with cognitive motivation, is more fundamental than metaphor.

Key words: metaphtonymy, idiom, anger, interaction, cognitive mechanism

摘要： 以Goossens提出的隐转喻理论以及Ruiz de Mendoza和Velasco对隐喻与转喻互动方式的论述为框架，选取具有代表性的体现“愤怒”情感的习语进行个案分析。研究结果不仅充分体现了习语内部认知机制的复杂性，也对隐喻和转喻相互作用模式进行了适当的描述与更加直观的展现，进一步证明隐喻与转喻共同决定了人们的思维方式，二者在概念层面存在密切联系，是人们概念系统的重要组成部分。转喻比隐喻更加基础，并为隐喻提供认知理据。

关键词: 隐转喻, 习语, 愤怒, 互动, 认知机制