Analysis of Emilys Subjectivity in Othello

›› 2014, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5): 82-85.

Previous Articles Next Articles

Analysis of Emilys Subjectivity in Othello

LUO Chunxia, CAO Qing, LI Bai

(Foreign Languages Department, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410076, China)

Received:2014-02-27 Revised:2014-03-10 Online:2014-10-31 Published:2016-04-06

《奥赛罗》中爱米莉亚的女性意识分析

罗春霞，曹青，李柏

长沙理工大学外国语学院，湖南长沙 410076

作者简介:罗春霞（1970-），女，安徽庐江人，长沙理工大学外国语学院副教授，硕士生导师，西南大学博士研究生，研究方向：英美文学及翻译理论与实践；曹青（1990-），女，湖南长沙人，长沙理工大学外国语学院英语语言文学专业硕士生，研究方向：英美文学。
基金资助:
湖南省社科课题“传统宇宙观视野下的莎士比亚‘和谐’主题研究”（12YBA008）

Abstract

Abstract: Othello, one of the most famous tragedies of Shakespeare, is not only a tragedy of love and marriage, but also a tragedy of females fate. Emily is a foil, but she plays a certain part and occupies an important position in this play. Emilys subjectivity in patriarchal and masculine society is analyzed according to the female literature criticism. The awakening, rising and fighting of her subjectivity and reasons of her tragic fate as a female are explored.

Key words: Shakespeare, Emily, subjectivity, tragic reasons

摘要： 莎士比亚著名的四大悲剧之一《奥赛罗》既是一部爱情和婚姻的悲剧，也是一部女性命运的悲剧。爱米莉亚虽是剧中的陪衬人物，却处于全剧中心事件的漩涡里，在戏剧冲突中占有重要的地位。以文学批评中的女性主体意识为切入点，分析爱米莉亚在父权和夫权社会中女性主体意识的苏醒、崛起和抗争，探讨她女性命运的悲剧原因。

关键词: 莎士比亚, 爱米莉亚, 女性主体意识, 悲剧原因

LUO Chunxia, CAO Qing, LI Bai. Analysis of Emilys Subjectivity in Othello[J]. , 2014, 14(5): 82-85.

罗春霞，曹青，李柏. 《奥赛罗》中爱米莉亚的女性意识分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）, 2014, 14(5): 82-85.

[1]	ZHANG Xiaoli1，2. Embodied Cognition and Construction of Translator as Embodied Subject [J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University Social Sciences Edition, 2023, 23(3): 106-112.
[2]	ZHOU Ge1，2. The Path from the Germination to the Dissolution of “Subjectivity” --An Analysis of the Deep Mechanism of Western Literary Theory [J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University Social Sciences Edition, 2022, 22(6): 100-105.
[3]	LUO Dijiang1,2. Value Subject: The Value Dimension of Translation Subjectivity [J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University Social Sciences Edition, 2022, 22(3): 90-96.
[4]	CHEN Caiyi. Seclusion and Expansion: Emily Dickinsons Four Spaces [J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University Social Sciences Edition, 2021, 21(4): 95-99.
[5]	DUAN Guozhong. Virtual Existence：Narrative Subjects of the “PostLiterature” Era [J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University Social Sciences Edition, 2021, 21(3): 78-84.
[6]	LUO Yimin, WANG Xi. The Marxist Dialectical Principles in the Shaping of Shakespearean Characters [J]. , 2021, 21(1): 80-87.
[7]	ZHANG Xuemei, JIANG Qian. On the Spiritual Disparity between Henry Ⅵ and Richard Ⅲ as Christian Kings [J]. , 2021, 21(1): 96-103.
[8]	YE Xiaobao1， DENG Gaosheng2. The Construction of the Translators Subjectivity in Dong Leshan Translation of Nineteen Eightyfour [J]. , 2020, 20(3): 93-98.
[9]	XIE Shijian, CHEN Xinguo. A Study of the “Madness” Euphemism in Shakespeares Four Great Tragedies [J]. , 2019, 19(3): 113-119.
[10]	LIU Cunwei1，2. On the Middle Construction in English from the Perspective of Cognitive Grammar [J]. , 2019, 19(2): 123-130.
[11]	XIE Shijian, LANG Rujuan. A Study on Rhetoric of the “Eye” Image in Shakespeare's Sonnets [J]. , 2018, 18(3): 151-156.
[12]	HUANG Shuyun. A Discourse Analysis Toward the Reported Speech in New York Times --With the News Reports on Capsized Ship “Oriental Star” [J]. , 2017, 17(5): 125-130.
[13]	JIA Liping, SU Xinjian. Translators Subjectivity in Translating Chinese Classics Based on the Perspective of Translation Ethics [J]. , 2017, 17(2): 125-129.
[14]	LIU Lei1, 2. An Anchorage of the Humanistic Idealist Complex --On the Eighteenth Shakespearean Sonnet [J]. , 2016, 16(2): 97-101.
[15]	XIE Chunhui, XIE Shijian. A Review of Domestic Studies on Shakespeares Rhetoric in the Past Two Decades [J]. , 2014, 14(5): 78-81.

Analysis of Emilys Subjectivity in Othello

《奥赛罗》中爱米莉亚的女性意识分析

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics