›› 2015, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4): 31-34.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Intrinsic Tension of Pluralism and Its Compromise

ZHANG Guojun   

  1. (School of Politics and Public Administration, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China)
  • Received:2015-03-03 Online:2015-08-31 Published:2016-01-29

多元主义的内在冲突及其调和

张国军   

  1. 西南政法大学 政治与公共管理学院,重庆 401120
  • 作者简介:张国军(1982-),男,山东滨州人,西南政法大学政治与公共管理学院讲师,博士,研究方向:民主理论、民族政治。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“政治认同视角的多民族国家民主化研究”(14YJC8100 16);中共中央编译局哲学社会科学基金委托项目“治理理论与法治中国系列研究”(14SQWT01)

Abstract: As two kinds of politics in modern society, universal equality politics and cultural difference politics are related to two pluralistic concepts which are value pluralism and cultural pluralism. The relationship between two pluralistic theories is complex, just as universal equality politics and cultural difference politics intertwine each other. Four modes of the way to deal with the relationship between the two pluralistic theories can be distinguished, and John Grays “Modus Vivendi” gets more applicability than the other modes while the liberalism is criticized parochialism and arbitrariness owing to its arguments against cultural pluralism.

Key words: universal equality, cultural difference, value pluralism, cultural pluralism

摘要: 现代社会中存在着普遍平等的政治与文化差异的政治,二者分别与两种多元主义观念相关,即价值多元主义与文化多元主义。正如普遍平等的政治与文化差异的政治相互交织,价值多元主义与文化多元主义之间也关系复杂。处理二者关系的策略可以分为四种模式,其中格雷的“权宜之计”适用性更强,而自由主义者试图消弭多元文化主义的论调则只能表明其狭隘性和独霸性。

关键词: 普遍平等, 文化差异, 价值多元主义, 文化多元主义