Abstract: The casualty in criminal law should contain conviction casualty and sentencing casualty and each has its own content. This advocating can effectively fill the vacancy of casualty in criminal law, make up for the deficiency of the system of current criminal law. It effectively changes the current situation that applies specific results in spite of lacking theoretical foundation, making the theory and practice united. Under the advocating, following the special rules of the sentencing casualty is the inevitable requirement of standardizing sentencing activities, realizing the principle of suiting punishment to crime and realizing judicial protection of human rights.

Key words: casualty in criminal law, binary and distinguishing point, system, sentencing casualty

摘要： 刑法因果关系应包含定罪和量刑两方面，且各自内容应有所区分。如此提倡之根据，在于其能有效填补当前刑法因果关系相关研究之空缺，弥补当下刑法理论体系性之不足。其有效改变了特定结果的刑法适用缺少理论根基之现状，实现刑法理论与司法实践的统一。二元区分下，遵循量刑因果关系特殊的内容判断和程度判断规则，是规范量刑活动、实现罪刑相适应、加强人权司法保障的必然要求。

关键词: 刑法因果关系, 二元区分, 体系性, 量刑因果关系