›› 2017, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6): 48-53.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on the Spatial Effect of Urban Tourism Economy Development in China

ZHANG Bo1,2, GU Fangzhe3, LI Shuang2, JIANG Ting2   

  1. (1.Institute of Economic Strategy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100028, China; 2.Business School, University of Jinan, Jinan 250002, China; 3.School of History and Culture Industry, University of Jinan, Jinan 250002, China)
  • Online:2017-12-01 Published:2017-12-29

区域分割与近邻融合: 我国城市旅游经济发展中的空间特性分析

张博1,2,顾方哲3,李爽2,蒋婷2   

  1. 1.中国社会科学院 财经战略研究院,北京 100028;2.济南大学 商学院,济南 250002;3.济南大学 历史与文化产业学院,济南 250022
  • 作者简介:张博(1982—),男,辽宁铁岭人,中国社会科学院财经战略研究院博士后,济南大学商学院讲师,博士,研究方向:旅游经济;顾方哲(1984—),女,山东济南人,济南大学历史与文化产业学院讲师,博士,研究方向:文化产业管理;李爽(1984—),女,山东济南人,济南大学商学院讲师,博士,研究方向:旅游地理;蒋婷(1979—),女,山东济南人,济南大学商学院讲师,博士,研究方向:服务管理。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目“‘一带一路’建设对我国区域旅游承载力影响的评估与对策研究”(16CGL022)

Abstract: The spatial effect of tourism economy in China during the period of 2005—2013 was examined. The result shows: firstly, the spatial correlation effect exists in the development of urban tourism economy in China, but there are significant differences along with the changes of threshold value and time. Secondly, under long distance conditions, area difference of the tourism economy development is obvious from the east to the west. Under short distance conditions, big cities, including Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, have high spatial correlation with neighboring cities, and show significant trend of merging development. Thirdly, results of the semivariable function model show the core different area between interurban tourism economies is at northwestsoutheast direction (north by west 79 degree), represented by the line from city of Shanghai to Chengdu. Low and medium difference areas mainly concentrated around Shanghai, Beijing and Guangzhou.

Key words: tourism economy, ESDA, IDW, spatialdependence effect

摘要: 以GIS平台的ESDA技术,对我国2005—2013年间337个地级以上城市的距离阈值与旅游收入面板数据进行分析。结果显示:我国城市旅游经济发展存在空间相关效应,随距离及时间变化差异显著。大阈值尺度下,东、西部区域分割现象明显;小阈值下,大城市与近邻城市间融合性发展趋势明显。半变异函数表面值显示,旅游经济的核心差异线以“江浙沪—成渝以西”走向为代表,中低差异线以“北、上、广”三线走向为代表。

关键词: 旅游经济, ESDA, 反距离权重法, 空间相关