[1]MORRIS C.Foundations of the theory of signs[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1938. [2]奥斯丁.论言有所为[J].许国璋,摘译.语言学译丛,1979(1):1-14. [3]〖ZK(#〗冉永平.当代语用学的发展趋势[J].现代外语,2005 (4):403-412. [4]BAKHTIN M.Discourse in the novel[M]//HOLQUIST M.The dialogic imagination austin. TX:University of Texas Press,1981. [5]廖美珍.目的原则'和目的分析:语用研究新途径探索:上[J].修辞学习,2005(3):1-10. [6]廖美珍.目的原则与目的分析:语用研究新途径探索:下[J].修辞学习,2005(4):5-11. [7]〖ZK(#〗亚里士多德.修辞学[M].罗念生,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1991. [8]AUSTIN J L.How to do things with words[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1962. [9]SEARLE R.The philosophy of language[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1971. [10]GRICE H P.Logic and conversation[M]//COLE P,MORGAN J. Syntax and semantics.New York:Academic Press,1975. [11]江玲.理性与冲突:关于合作原则在法庭互动话语中的适用性[J].吉林师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2010(6):34-37. [12]LEECH G N.Principles of pragmatics[M].London:Longman,1983. [13]〖ZK(#〗BROWN P,LEVINSON S.Politeness:some universals in language usage[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1987. [14]MYERS G.The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles[J].Applied linguistics,1989(1):1-35. [15]曹霞.法律英语的语用特征[J].山西财经大学学报(高等教育版),2003(1):41-43. [16]VERSCHUEREN J.Understanding pragmatics[M].London Edward Arnold Ltd.,1999. [17]LEVINSON S C.Pragmatics[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University,1983. [18]冉永平.指示语选择的语用视点、语用移情与离情[J].外语教学与研究,2007(9):331-337. [19]孙光宁.判决书写作中的消极修辞与积极修辞[J].法制与社会发展,2011(3):62-71. [20]邱昭继.论判决书中“法官后语”的语篇分析[J].修辞学习,2006(4):29-32. 〖JZ(〗〖WT4HZ〗Pragmatic Interpretation of Criminal Judgments 〖WT5BZ〗HE Jingqiu, HE Hongqiang 〖WT5”BZ〗(Northwest University of Politics & Law, Xian 710122, China) 〖WTHZ〗Abstract:The criminal judgment is not a static “oneway” text but a “twoway” discourse involving interaction between the writer and audience of the judgment seen from the pragmatic perspective. The judgment writing is influenced by many pragmatic parameters such as legal environment, social distance, power relations, rights and obligations. Analysis of a large corpus has demonstrated that pragmatic theories have strong applicability and explanatory power in using and understanding the criminal judgment discourse, which has further proved that the pragmatic perspective is an operational method for studying the judgment. 〖WTHZ〗Key words:criminal judgment; principle of goals; speech act theory; cooperative principle; politeness principle and face theory; adaptation theory 〖JY〗〖HT5H〗(责任编辑:张)