重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4): 31-34.
• 法学研究 • 上一篇 下一篇
张国军
收稿日期:
出版日期:
发布日期:
作者简介:
基金资助:
ZHANG Guojun
Received:
Online:
Published:
摘要： 现代社会中存在着普遍平等的政治与文化差异的政治，二者分别与两种多元主义观念相关，即价值多元主义与文化多元主义。正如普遍平等的政治与文化差异的政治相互交织，价值多元主义与文化多元主义之间也关系复杂。处理二者关系的策略可以分为四种模式，其中格雷的“权宜之计”适用性更强，而自由主义者试图消弭多元文化主义的论调则只能表明其狭隘性和独霸性。
关键词: 普遍平等, 文化差异, 价值多元主义, 文化多元主义
Abstract: As two kinds of politics in modern society, universal equality politics and cultural difference politics are related to two pluralistic concepts which are value pluralism and cultural pluralism. The relationship between two pluralistic theories is complex, just as universal equality politics and cultural difference politics intertwine each other. Four modes of the way to deal with the relationship between the two pluralistic theories can be distinguished, and John Grays “Modus Vivendi” gets more applicability than the other modes while the liberalism is criticized parochialism and arbitrariness owing to its arguments against cultural pluralism.
Key words: universal equality, cultural difference, value pluralism, cultural pluralism
张国军. 多元主义的内在冲突及其调和[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 15(4): 31-34.
ZHANG Guojun. Intrinsic Tension of Pluralism and Its Compromise[J]. , 2015, 15(4): 31-34.
0 / / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: http://xbskb.cqjtu.edu.cn/CN/
http://xbskb.cqjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2015/V15/I4/31
