刑法因果关系二元区分之提倡

重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5): 27-31.

刑法因果关系二元区分之提倡

密齐深

西南政法大学法学院，重庆 401120

收稿日期:2015-05-15 出版日期:2015-10-31 发布日期:2021-04-16
作者简介:密齐深（1989-），男，山东临沂人，西南政法大学2013级硕士研究生，量刑研究中心研究员，研究方向：中国刑法学。
基金资助:
西南政法大学研究生科研创新计划项目“论量刑中因果关系的存在必要性及司法适用”(2013XZYJS224)

The Advocating of Binary and Distinguishing Casualty in Criminal Law

MI Qishen

(School of Law, Southwest University Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China)

Received:2015-05-15 Online:2015-10-31 Published:2021-04-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 刑法因果关系应包含定罪和量刑两方面，且各自内容应有所区分。如此提倡之根据，在于其能有效填补当前刑法因果关系相关研究之空缺，弥补当下刑法理论体系性之不足。其有效改变了特定结果的刑法适用缺少理论根基之现状，实现刑法理论与司法实践的统一。二元区分下，遵循量刑因果关系特殊的内容判断和程度判断规则，是规范量刑活动、实现罪刑相适应、加强人权司法保障的必然要求。

关键词: 刑法因果关系, 二元区分, 体系性, 量刑因果关系

Abstract: The casualty in criminal law should contain conviction casualty and sentencing casualty and each has its own content. This advocating can effectively fill the vacancy of casualty in criminal law, make up for the deficiency of the system of current criminal law. It effectively changes the current situation that applies specific results in spite of lacking theoretical foundation, making the theory and practice united. Under the advocating, following the special rules of the sentencing casualty is the inevitable requirement of standardizing sentencing activities, realizing the principle of suiting punishment to crime and realizing judicial protection of human rights.

Key words: casualty in criminal law, binary and distinguishing point, system, sentencing casualty

密齐深. 刑法因果关系二元区分之提倡[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 15(5): 27-31.

MI Qishen. The Advocating of Binary and Distinguishing Casualty in Criminal Law[J]. , 2015, 15(5): 27-31.