职务犯罪侦查预防非法取证工作机制反思与重构

重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2017, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1): 14-18.

职务犯罪侦查预防非法取证工作机制反思与重构

任立维1，张雷2

1.重庆市秀山县人民检察院，重庆 409900；2.重庆市酉阳县人民检察院，重庆 409800

收稿日期:2016-04-08 修回日期:2016-06-29 出版日期:2017-01-02 发布日期:2017-02-22
作者简介:任立维（1984—），男，黑龙江绥化人，重庆市秀山县人民检察院研究室主任，法学硕士，研究方向：刑法学、刑诉法学；张雷（1992—），男，重庆酉阳人，重庆市酉阳县人民检察院助理检察员，法学硕士，研究方向：刑法学、刑诉法学。
基金资助:
重庆市人民检察院2015年重点课题“职务犯罪案件源头预防非法取证工作机制研究”（CQJCY 2015B07）

Reflection and Reconstruction of the Mechanism of Investigating and Preventing Illegal Evidence Collection in the Investigation of Duty Crime

REN Liwei1, ZHANG Lei2

(1.Xiushan County Peoples Procuratorate, Chongqing 409900, China; 2.Youyang County Peoples Procuratorate, Chongqing 409800, China)

Received:2016-04-08 Revised:2016-06-29 Online:2017-01-02 Published:2017-02-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 司法实践中之所以会出现职务犯罪刑事错案，根源在于侦查阶段的非法取证。实证调查重庆市渝东南片区检察机关的相关工作情况，可以发现当下的职务犯罪侦查预防非法取证工作机制存在讯问犯罪嫌疑人、询问证人程序不够规范，羁押入所和讯问、询问场所规定不够完善等问题。究其缘由，在于侦查措施不够完善，职侦与公诉部门衔接不足，侦查取证技能有待提升，取证过程和证据审查缺乏有效监督等制度缺失。检察机关应当完善原有的预防非法取证工作机制，努力做到从源头预防非法取证，提升办案质量。

关键词: 职务犯罪, 预防, 非法取证, 工作机制

Abstract: 〖JP2〗In the judicial practice, the reason of the root of misjudged criminal case lies in the illegal evidence in the investigation stage. Through empirical investigation of the procuratorial organs in southeast district of Chongqing, it can be found that present duty crime investigation prevention illegal evidence collection mechanism is not standard in the interrogation of a criminal suspect and questioning witnesses procedure.The detention in the interrogation and inquiry place provisions are not perfect etc. The reason is that the investigation measures are not perfect, position of procuratorial and public prosecution department convergence is not sufficient. The skills of the investigation and evidence collection need improving. The forensic process and review of the evidence lack effective supervision system. Therefore, the procuratorial organs should improve the existing mechanisms for the prevention of illegal evidence collection, and strive to prevent illegal evidence from the source to improve the quality of handling cases.〖JP〗

Key words: duty crime, prevention, illegal evidence collection, working mechanism

任立维1，张雷2. 职务犯罪侦查预防非法取证工作机制反思与重构[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）, 2017, 17(1): 14-18.

REN Liwei1, ZHANG Lei2. Reflection and Reconstruction of the Mechanism of Investigating and Preventing Illegal Evidence Collection in the Investigation of Duty Crime[J]. , 2017, 17(1): 14-18.

参考文献

［1］陈光中,郭志媛.非法证据排除规则实施若干问题研究:以实证调查为视角［J］.法学杂志,2014(5):17.
［2］詹复亮.职务犯罪侦查热点问题研究［M］.北京:中国检察出版社,2013:105.
［3］苏喜民,阎玮.侦查环节的权利保障机制初探:以侦查环节实施刑事非法证据排除规则为视角［J］.中国刑事法杂志,2013(1):20.
［4］王建平.现行刑事诉讼法视角下的职务犯罪侦查工作［M］.北京：法律出版社,2014:134.
［5］李寿伟.非法证据排除制度的若干问题［J］.中国刑事法杂志,2014(2):15.
［6］单民,董坤.检察机关适用非法证据排除规则若干问题探讨:兼论《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则(试行)》修改的意见和建议［J］.河北法学,2014(5):114.
［7］楼伯坤，朱霞.非法证据排除范围的选择原则与适用［J］.江苏警官学院学报,2012(5): 120. 〖JZ（〗〖WT4HZ〗Reflection and Reconstruction of the Mechanism of Investigating and Preventing Illegal Evidence Collection in the Investigation of Duty Crime 〖WT5BZ〗REN Liwei1, ZHANG Lei2 〖WT5”BZ〗(1.Xiushan County Peoples Procuratorate, Chongqing 409900, China; 2.Youyang County Peoples Procuratorate, Chongqing 409800, China) 〖WTHZ〗Abstract：〖JP2〗In the judicial practice, the reason of the root of misjudged criminal case lies in the illegal evidence in the investigation stage. Through empirical investigation of the procuratorial organs in southeast district of Chongqing, it can be found that present duty crime investigation prevention illegal evidence collection mechanism is not standard in the interrogation of a criminal suspect and questioning witnesses procedure.The detention in the interrogation and inquiry place provisions are not perfect etc. The reason is that the investigation measures are not perfect, position of procuratorial and public prosecution department convergence is not sufficient. The skills of the investigation and evidence collection need improving. The forensic process and review of the evidence lack effective supervision system. Therefore, the procuratorial organs should improve the existing mechanisms for the prevention of illegal evidence collection, and strive to prevent illegal evidence from the source to improve the quality of handling cases.〖JP〗〖WTHZ〗Key words：duty crime; prevention; illegal evidence collection; working mechanism 〖JY〗〖HT5H〗（责任编辑：李晓梅）〖LM〗

[1]	刘辰远1，于雅璁2. 论刑法与企业合规不起诉的衔接〖HJ1.95mm〗[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22(6): 18-26.
[2]	李婉楠. 校园欺凌现象的犯罪学评价及预防路径[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）, 2016, 16(4): 15-19.
[3]	胡浩李宝娣. 高校领导干部监督工作存在的问题及对策[J]. , 2008, 8(06): 17-17.