叹词的概念意义与程序意义

重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 107-112.

• 语言学研究 • 上一篇

叹词的概念意义与程序意义

黄弋桓1，黄兰堞2

1.重庆交通大学外国语学院，重庆 400074；2.桂林航天工业学院外语外贸学院，广西桂林 541004

收稿日期:2019-09-10 出版日期:2020-03-20 发布日期:2020-04-01
作者简介:黄弋桓（1979—），女，重庆交通大学外国语学院副教授，博士，研究方向：理论语言学、汉语研究；黄兰堞（1981—），女，桂林航天工业学院外语外贸学院讲师，硕士，研究方向：英汉语言文化对比。
基金资助:
重庆交通大学教育教学改革研究项目“理工科院校外语专业的汉语课程教学改革与实践——以重庆交通大学为例”（1903056）

Conceptual Meaning and Procedural Meaning of Interjections

HUANG Yihuan1, HUNAG Landie2

(1.School of Foreign Languages, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 2.School of Foreign Studies, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China)

Received:2019-09-10 Online:2020-03-20 Published:2020-04-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 叹词一般被认为是表达性而非陈述性的，只包含情感意义。概念论者基于NSM理论，认为叹词有一些概念上的负荷，叹词具有指示性和规约性特点，能够传递概念内容。关联论者基于关联理论，认为叹词包含程序意义，可以构建较高层次显义，也可以激活命题态度或态度描述。对于叹词意义的非情感认识有助于更深入地了解这一语言现象。

关键词: 叹词, 概念意义, 程序意义

Abstract: Interjections are generally regarded as expressive rather than declarative, and only contain emotional meaning. Conceptual theorists, based on NSM theory, believe that interjections rely on universal or nearuniversal concepts. And because of indexicality and conventionality of interjections, they can convey conceptual content. Relevance theorists, based on Relevance Theory, believe that interjections contain procedural meaning, they can construct higherlevel explicatures and can also activate propositional attitudes or attitude descriptions. A nonemotional understanding of the meaning of interjections is helpful for a deeper understanding of this linguistic phenomenon.

Key words: interjection, conceptual meaning, procedural meaning

黄弋桓1，黄兰堞2. 叹词的概念意义与程序意义[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 20(2): 107-112.

HUANG Yihuan1, HUNAG Landie2. Conceptual Meaning and Procedural Meaning of Interjections[J]. , 2020, 20(2): 107-112.

参考文献

［1］罗宾斯 R H.简明语言学史［M］.许德宝,等译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1997.
［2］AMEKA F.Interjections:the universal yet neglected part of speech［J］.Journal of pragmatics,1992,18(2/3):101-118.
［3］QUIRK R,GREENBAUM S,LEECH G,et al.A grammar of contemporary English［M］.London:Longman,1972:358.
［4］BLOOMFIELD L.Language［M］.Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2001:185.
［5］GOFFMAN E.Response cries［M］//Forms of talk.Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press,1981:99.
［6］EASTMAN C M.Swahili interjections:blurring languageuse/gestureuse boundaries［J］.Journal of pragmatics,1992,18(2/3):282,285.
［7］KOCKELMAN P.The meanings of interjections in Qeqchi Maya:from emotive reaction to social and discursive action［J］.Current anthropology,2003,44(4):467.
［8］WIERZBICKA A.The semantics of interjection［J］.Journal of pragmatics,1992,18(2/3):159-192.
［9］AMEKA F K,WILKINS D P.Interjections［M］//STMAN JO,VERSCHUEREN J. Handbook of pragmatics.Amsterdam:John Benjamins,2006.
［10］李炯英,李葆嘉.NSM理论的研究目标、原则和方法［J］.当代语言学,2007(1):69.
［11］WEERZBICKA A.Crosscultural pragmatics:the semantics of human interaction ［M］.2nd ed.Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter,2003:291.
［12］WILKINS D P.Interjections as deictics［J］.Journal of pragmatics,1992,18(2/3):119-158.
［13］WILKINS D P.Expanding the traditional category of deictic elements: interjections as deictics［M］//DUCHAN J F,BRUDER G A,HEWITT L E.Deixis in narrative:a cognitive science perspective.New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,1995.
［14］SCHOURUP L.Rethinking well［J］.Journal of pragmatics,2001,33(7):1025-1060.
［15］CLARK H H,FOX TREE J E.Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking［J］.Cognition,2002,84(1):77.
［16］EVANS N.“Wanjh! Bonj! Nja!”:sequential organization and social deixis in Mayali interjections［J］.Journal of pragmatics,1992,18(2/3):229,240.
［17］PADILLA CRUZ M.Might interjections encode concepts More questions than answers［J］.Lodz papers in pragmatics,2009,5(2):241-270.
［18］WHARTON T.Interjections,language and the“showing”/“saying” continuum［J］.Pragmatics and cognition,2003,11(1):173-215.
［19］WILSON D,WHARTON T.Relevance and prosody［J］.Journal of pragmatics,2006,38(10):1571.
［20］WALASZEWSKA E.What to do with response cries in relevance theory［C］// MIODUSZEWSKA E.Relevance studies in Poland.Warsaw:University of Warsaw,2004.
［21］FRASER B.On the conceptualprocedural distinction［J］.Style,2006,40(1/2): 31.
［22］FRASER B.An account of discourse markers［J］.International review of pragmatics,2009,1(2):308.
［23］WILSON D.The conceptualprocedural distinction:past,present and future［M］//ESCANDELLVIDAL V,LEONETTI M,AHERN A.Procedural meaning:problems and perspectives.Bingley:Emerald,2011:5.
［24］萨丕尔 E.语言论［M］.陆卓元,译.陆志韦,校订.北京:商务印书馆,2010:6.

叹词的概念意义与程序意义

Conceptual Meaning and Procedural Meaning of Interjections

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics