重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 48-54.

• 人文交通 • 上一篇    下一篇

铁路信号系统安全证据的属性判断

杨军,潘华   

  1. 北京交通大学 法学院,北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-24 修回日期:2021-01-09 出版日期:2021-11-20 发布日期:2021-11-25
  • 作者简介:杨军(1978—),男,北京交通大学法学院副教授,博士,研究方向:交通法;潘华(1996—),男,北京交通大学法学院硕士研究生,研究方向:交通法。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“高速铁路信号系统安全评估基础理论与方法研究”(U1434209)

The Judgment of the Attributes of the Safety Evidence of the Railway Signal System

YANG Jun, PAN Hua   

  1. School of Law, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2020-10-24 Revised:2021-01-09 Online:2021-11-20 Published:2021-11-25

摘要: 铁路信号系统安全证据具有一定的特殊性。在客观性方面,铁路信号系统安全证据除应满足内容和形式客观外,应从科学性和时效性的角度克服其主观性较强的问题。在关联性方面,铁路信号系统安全证据应当从关联性层级决定证明能力层级角度,设定安全证据采纳的最低关联性标准,同时还应注意关联性包含安全证据“证是”和“证否”的双重功能。在合法性方面,铁路信号系统安全证据应当同时满足主体、形式、程序合法的要求。

关键词: 铁路信号系统安全证据, 客观性, 关联性, 合法性

Abstract: The safety evidence of the rail signal system has its particularity. In terms of objectivity, the safety evidence of the rail signal system should not only satisfy the objective content and form, but also overcome its subjective problems from the perspective of scientificity and timeliness. In terms of relevance, the security evidence of the rail signal system should be determined from the perspective of the level of relevance to determine the level of proof capability, set the minimum relevance standard for the adoption of security evidence. At the same time, it should be noted that the relevance includes security evidence that can be proved and the dual function of verification and falsification. In terms of legitimacy, the rail signal system security evidence should meet the legal requirements of the subject, form, and procedure.

Key words: rail signal system safety evidence, objectivity, relevance, legitimacy