重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 12-21.

• 中国式现代化研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字意识形态的发展态势、风险样态与治理路向

温晓年1,2,欧阳彬1   

  1. 1电子科技大学 马克思主义学院,成都 611731;2广东医科大学 生物医学工程学院,广东 东莞 523808
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-03 修回日期:2024-11-21 出版日期:2026-02-09 发布日期:2026-02-09
  • 作者简介:温晓年,男,电子科技大学马克思主义学院博士研究生,广东医科大学副教授;欧阳彬,男,电子科技大学马克思主义学院教授,博士,博士生导师。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究专项任务项目“ChatGPT对高校意识形态安全的挑战与应对研究”(23JDSZ3144);广东省教育科学规划课题“生成式人工智能对高校网络意识形态安全的影响与风险防范研究”(2023GXJK039);广东医科大学国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目“粤语艺境:促进粤港澳大湾区粤语艺术文化自信交流的理论研究”(202410571034);广东医科大学省级大学生创新创业训练计划项目“智媒时代大学生网络意识形态安全风险防范化解研究”(S202410571118);广东医科大学省级大学生创新创业训练计划项目“乡村振兴视域下乡村优秀传统文化的传承与转化研究——以东莞市企石镇为例”(S202410571091)。

Development Trend, Risk Perspective and Governance Direction of Digital Ideology

Wen Xiaonian1,2, Ouyang Bin1   

  1. 1.School of Marxism, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China; 2.School of Biomedical Engineering, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong 523808, China
  • Received:2024-10-03 Revised:2024-11-21 Online:2026-02-09 Published:2026-02-09

摘要: 数字意识形态是数字技术与意识形态相结合的产物,是意识形态发展的最新形态,有其独特的发展规律,呈现数字技术的意识形态化和意识形态的数字化转向发展态势。数字意识形态扩大了意识形态的传播面,提高了意识形态的认知度、接受度和价值重塑力,同时也让主流意识形态在数字时代面临更大的风险挑战,数字帝国主义、数字产消主义、数字历史虚无主义等数字资本主义意识形态在数字空间的传播渗透更具隐蔽性、扩张性和危害性。在数字资本增殖逻辑下,数字资本主义意识形态的传播渗透将冲击主流意识形态的主导权,消解主流意识形态的引领力和话语权威。要从增强数字主体的数字意识形态风险认知能力、推进主流意识形态的数字化转向、建立数字意识形态风险的协同治理机制、实施数字意识形态风险的全周期监管等治理措施消弭数字意识形态风险,使数字意识形态生态健康有序发展。

关键词: 数字意识形态;发展态势;风险透视;治理路向

Abstract: Digital ideology is the product of the combination of digital technology and ideology, and is the latest form of ideological development. It has its own unique development law, showing the development trend of ideological and digital construction of digital technology. Digital ideology has improved the communication power, awareness, acceptance and value remodeling ability of ideology. At the same time, it also makes the mainstream ideology face greater risks and challenges in the digital era, and the dissemination and penetration of digital capitalist ideology such as digital imperialism, digital productivism and digital historical hypocrisy in the digital space more hidden, expansive and harmful. Under the logic of digital capital multiplication, the spread and penetration of digital capitalist ideology will impact the dominant power of mainstream ideology and dissolve the leading power and discourse authority of mainstream ideology. It is necessary to strengthen the digital ideological risk cognition ability of digital subjects, promote the digital transformation of mainstream ideology, establish a collaborative governance mechanism for digital ideological risk, implement the fullcycle supervision of digital ideological risk and other governance measures to eliminate digital ideological risk, so that the digital ideological ecology develops in a healthy and orderly direction.

Key words: digital ideology; development trend; risk perspective; governance direction