重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 61-71.

• 人文交通 • 上一篇    下一篇

论醉酒型危险驾驶行为出罪的四重路径

王胜华,郭雨薇   

  1. 石河子大学 法学院,新疆 石河子 832003
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-23 修回日期:2024-09-21 出版日期:2026-02-09 发布日期:2026-02-09
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目“新时代新疆反恐的成功经验研究”(21BFX063)

Four Approaches to Drunk Driving Discriminalization from Criminal Responsibility

Wang Shenghua, Guo Yuwei   

  1. School of Law, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xijiang 832003, China
  • Received:2024-07-23 Revised:2024-09-21 Online:2026-02-09 Published:2026-02-09

摘要: 面对醉驾入罪数量高居不下的现状,以往严惩醉驾的司法治理方式越发显得捉襟见肘。当前,司法机关应出于刑法宽宥、谦抑和经济的理念,合理采取有效应对犯罪行为的措施,将实质上不构成犯罪的醉驾行为或不值得用刑罚处罚的醉驾行为尽早、及时地予以出罪,以符合当下刑事司法政策、契合醉驾治理的社会期待。基于最新司法解释和有效司法经验,可将某些醉驾行为直接出罪的路径归纳为四种,分别是行为在实质上属于危害不大的“但书”出罪、客观上具有违法阻却事由的“紧急避险”出罪、主观上排除罪责的没有“期待可能性”出罪,以及道德上符合朴素正义的“常识常理常情”出罪。

关键词: 醉驾;出罪;但书;紧急避险;期待可能性;常识常理常情

Abstract: Confronted with the prevailing issue of drunk driving discrimnalization, the traditional punitive approach to addressing such transgressions within the judicial system has proven increasingly inadequate. In response, it is imperative for law enforcement agencies to take reasonable and effective measures to deal with criminal behaviour rooted in principles of criminal law forgiveness, moderation and efficiency. This necessitates promptly penalizing instances of drunk driving that do not warrant legal action or are inconsequential, aligning with contemporary criminal justice policies and societal expectations for effective drunk driving control. Drawing on recent judicial interpretations and successful legal precedents, certain forms of drunk driving can be directly addressed through four distinct avenues: “de minimis” offenses lacking inherent harm; “emergency avoidance” cases involving objective obstruction; subjectively excluded crimes devoid of any expectation of wrongdoing; and morally justifiable transgressions based on common sense.

Key words: drunk driving; discriminalization; proviso; emergency to avoid danger; expected possibilities; common sense