刑事判决书的语用诠释

重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 112-116.

刑事判决书的语用诠释

何静秋，贺红强

西北政法大学，西安 710122

收稿日期:2014-10-27 出版日期:2016-02-28 发布日期:2016-03-02
作者简介:何静秋（1980-），女，四川泸州人，西北政法大学副教授，硕士，研究方向：语用学、法律修辞学；贺红强（1980-），男，内蒙古呼和浩特人，西北政法大学副教授，博士，研究方向：刑事诉讼法。
基金资助:
2014年国家社科基金重点项目“建设高素质法治工作队伍研究”（14AZD151）；2013年广东省高等学校学科与专业建设专项资金一般项目“失范与规范之间：刑事庭审秩序的理路与进路”（2013WYXM0050）；2014年湛江市科技攻关项目“对比修辞视域下的司法判决书研究”（2014B01074）

Pragmatic Interpretation of Criminal Judgments

HE Jingqiu， HE Hongqiang

(Northwest University of Politics & Law, Xian 710122, China)

Received:2014-10-27 Online:2016-02-28 Published:2016-03-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 刑事判决书不是一个静态的“单向”文本，在语用学的视角下审视判决书，可以发现它是一个包含判决书书写者与判决书受众之间互动的“双向”语篇。判决书中的语言受到特定的法系环境、社会距离、权势关系、权利和义务等语用参数的影响。对判决书文本中典型语料的分析，证明语用学理论对判决书话语的使用和理解具有很强的适用性和解释力，进而证明了语用学视角是研究判决书语言的一种可操作的分析进路。

关键词: 刑事判决书, 目的原则, 言语行为理论, 合作原则, 礼貌原则与面子论, 顺应论

Abstract: The criminal judgment is not a static “oneway” text but a “twoway” discourse involving interaction between the writer and audience of the judgment seen from the pragmatic perspective. The judgment writing is influenced by many pragmatic parameters such as legal environment, social distance, power relations, rights and obligations. Analysis of a large corpus has demonstrated that pragmatic theories have strong applicability and explanatory power in using and understanding the criminal judgment discourse, which has further proved that the pragmatic perspective is an operational method for studying the judgment.

Key words: criminal judgment, principle of goals, speech act theory, cooperative principle, politeness principle and face theory, adaptation theory

何静秋，贺红强. 刑事判决书的语用诠释[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）, 2016, 16(1): 112-116.

HE Jingqiu， HE Hongqiang. Pragmatic Interpretation of Criminal Judgments[J]. , 2016, 16(1): 112-116.

参考文献

［1］MORRIS C.Foundations of the theory of signs［M］.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1938.
［2］奥斯丁.论言有所为［J］.许国璋,摘译.语言学译丛,1979(1):1-14.
［3］〖ZK（#〗冉永平.当代语用学的发展趋势［J］.现代外语,2005 (4):403-412.
［4］BAKHTIN M.Discourse in the novel［M］//HOLQUIST M.The dialogic imagination austin. TX:University of Texas Press,1981.
［5］廖美珍.目的原则'和目的分析：语用研究新途径探索:上［J］.修辞学习,2005(3):1-10.
［6］廖美珍.目的原则与目的分析：语用研究新途径探索:下［J］.修辞学习,2005(4):5-11.
［7］〖ZK（#〗亚里士多德.修辞学［M］.罗念生,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1991.
［8］AUSTIN J L.How to do things with words［M］.New York:Oxford University Press,1962.
［9］SEARLE R.The philosophy of language［M］.Oxford:Oxford University Press,1971.
［10］GRICE H P.Logic and conversation［M］//COLE P,MORGAN J. Syntax and semantics.New York:Academic Press,1975.
［11］江玲.理性与冲突:关于合作原则在法庭互动话语中的适用性［J］.吉林师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2010(6):34-37.
［12］LEECH G N.Principles of pragmatics［M］.London:Longman,1983.
［13］〖ZK（#〗BROWN P,LEVINSON S.Politeness:some universals in language usage［M］.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1987.
［14］MYERS G.The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles［J］.Applied linguistics,1989(1):1-35.
［15］曹霞.法律英语的语用特征［J］.山西财经大学学报(高等教育版),2003(1):41-43.
［16］VERSCHUEREN J.Understanding pragmatics［M］.London Edward Arnold Ltd.,1999.
［17］LEVINSON S C.Pragmatics［M］.Cambridge: Cambridge University,1983.
［18］冉永平.指示语选择的语用视点、语用移情与离情［J］.外语教学与研究,2007(9):331-337.
［19］孙光宁.判决书写作中的消极修辞与积极修辞［J］.法制与社会发展,2011(3):62-71.
［20］邱昭继.论判决书中“法官后语”的语篇分析［J］.修辞学习,2006(4):29-32. 〖JZ（〗〖WT4HZ〗Pragmatic Interpretation of Criminal Judgments 〖WT5BZ〗HE Jingqiu， HE Hongqiang 〖WT5”BZ〗(Northwest University of Politics & Law, Xian 710122, China) 〖WTHZ〗Abstract：The criminal judgment is not a static “oneway” text but a “twoway” discourse involving interaction between the writer and audience of the judgment seen from the pragmatic perspective. The judgment writing is influenced by many pragmatic parameters such as legal environment, social distance, power relations, rights and obligations. Analysis of a large corpus has demonstrated that pragmatic theories have strong applicability and explanatory power in using and understanding the criminal judgment discourse, which has further proved that the pragmatic perspective is an operational method for studying the judgment. 〖WTHZ〗Key words：criminal judgment; principle of goals; speech act theory; cooperative principle; politeness principle and face theory; adaptation theory 〖JY〗〖HT5H〗（责任编辑：张）

[1]	齐新刚. 商务英语信函中语用含糊的认知语用阐释[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）, 2017, 17(6): 134-138.
[2]	肖春艳. 语用顺应论：一个诗歌评析的新视角 ——从英诗《When You Are Old》的文学顺应性谈起[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）, 2016, 16(4): 128-133.