东南亚航运通道安全合作机制研究

重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1): 19-23.

东南亚航运通道安全合作机制研究

陈飞儿1，左志维2，冯桂3

1.上海交通大学，上海 200240；2.北京大学，北京 100871；3.浙江省安全生产科学研究院，浙江杭州 310012

收稿日期:2014-06-17 出版日期:2015-02-28 发布日期:2015-02-28
作者简介:陈飞儿（1981-），女，上海交通大学船舶与海洋工程学院讲师，博士，研究方向：航运与物流管理、海上战略通道安全。
基金资助:
2012年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“保障航线安全的外交问题研究”（12YJCGJW001）

Research on Shipping Channel Security Cooperation Mechanism of Southeast Asia Area

CHEN Feier1, ZUO Zhiwei2, FENG Gui3

1.Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China; 2.Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; 3.Zhejiang Institute of Safety Science and Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, China

Received:2014-06-17 Online:2015-02-28 Published:2015-02-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 东南亚航运通道是国家能源等运输的关键路径，其利益攸关方形成了众多的安全合作机制。已有文献对安全合作机制的必要性、有效性和可行性进行了充分阐释，但对其困难性未有全面研究。为此，以马六甲海峡为例，从航运通道安全的定义和内涵入手，介绍现有的安全合作机制，并应用建构主义理论和新制度经济学方法探讨了合作机制的形成、集体行动的困境以及制度变迁的原因和趋势，提出新的安全合作机制。

关键词: 航运通道安全, 安全合作机制, 建构主义, 新制度经济学

Abstract: The shipping channel of Malacca Strait is a critical path for energy transport. Stakeholders in the context of Southeast Asian shipping channel accomplish numerous security cooperation mechanism. Existing literatures explained a lot on the need for security cooperation mechanisms, effectiveness and feasibility, but its difficulty is not a comprehensive study. The Malacca Strait is taken as an example, starting from definition and connotation of shipping channel security, to describe existing security cooperation mechanisms. Constructivist theory and new institutional economics approach are applied to explore the formation of cooperative mechanisms, collective action dilemma and causes and trends of institutional change, and to promote a new security cooperation mechanism.

Key words: security of shipping channel, security cooperation mechanism, constructivist theory, new institutional economics

陈飞儿1，左志维2，冯桂3. 东南亚航运通道安全合作机制研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）, 2015, 15(1): 19-23.

CHEN Feier1, ZUO Zhiwei2, FENG Gui3. Research on Shipping Channel Security Cooperation Mechanism of Southeast Asia Area[J]. , 2015, 15(1): 19-23.

参考文献

［1］（法）达里奥·巴蒂斯特拉.国际关系理论［M］.潘革平,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2010:123-167.
［2］Alberto A Encomienda.Cooperative Mechanism for Safety and Security of Navigation and Ocean Governance in the South China Sea［M］.Securing the Safety of Navigation in East Asia,2013:191-213.
［3］Chen Sulan.Environmental cooperation in the South China Sea: Factors, actors and mechanisms ［J］.Ocean & Coastal Management,2013,85（B）:131-140.
［4］Juan Luis, Suárez de Vivero.The European vision for oceans and seasSocial and political dimensions of the Green Paper on Maritime Policy for the EU［J］.Marine Policy,2007,31（4）:409-414.
［5］赵卫华.当前越南共产党的国家安全战略及对中越关系的影响［J］.重庆交通大学学报:社会科学版,2012,12（3）:88-91.
［6］Paola Papa.US and EU strategies for maritime transport security: A comparative perspective［J］.Transport Policy,2013,28:75-85.
［7］Zohal Hessami.Political corruption,public procurement,and budget composition:Theory and evidence from OECD countries［J］.European Journal of Political Economy,2014,34:372-389.〖JP〗
［8］Zhang Zhongxiang.Chinas energy security,the Malacca dilemma and responses［J］.Energy Policy,2011,39:76127615.
［9］彭芳.从建构主义的视角分析东盟建构安全共同体的缺失［D］.广州:暨南大学,2006.
［10］李昌新.海权与国家安全：东南亚海上冲突与合作研究［D］.广州:暨南大学,2006.
［11］卢现祥,朱巧玲.新制度经济学［M］.北京:北京大学出版社,2012.
［12］包广将.马六甲航道国际维航合作机制研究［D］.上海:上海社会科学院,2010.
［13］Guy C K Leung,Cherp Aleh,Jewell Jessica,et al.Securitization of energy supply chains in China［J］.Applied Energy,2014,123:316-326.
［14］Sascha Pristrom,Li Kevin X,Yang Zaili,et al.A study of maritime security and piracy［J］.Maritime Policy & Management:The Flagship Journal of International Shipping and Port Research,2014,40（7）:675-693.

[1]	张丽荣. 从“朋友”到“敌人”： 20世纪70年代利比亚和埃及关系问题[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）, 2016, 16(4): 41-46.
[2]	刘苏景. 现代远程开放教育理念下以学生为主体的英语教学模式探讨[J]. , 2008, 8(06): 126-126.
[3]	赵春生. 现实主义与建构主义视野中的文化与意识形态软实力[J]. , 2007, 7(04): 98-98.
[4]	乔春华. 试论网络辅助的英语过程写作教学模式[J]. , 2006, 6(03): 112-112.