英语语音测试手段与评估方式 ——基于SSCI和CSSCI数据库实证研究文献（2010—2016）的述评

重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 134-139.

英语语音测试手段与评估方式 ——基于SSCI和CSSCI数据库实证研究文献（2010—2016）的述评

魏可晗，裴正薇

南京农业大学外国语学院，南京 210095

收稿日期:2017-08-02 出版日期:2018-04-20 发布日期:2018-04-18
作者简介:魏可晗（1993—），女，南京农业大学外国语学院硕士研究生，研究方向：二语语音习得；裴正薇（1973—），女，南京农业大学外国语学院教授，博士，研究方向：二语语音习得和外语教学。
基金资助:
江苏省社会科学基金项目“影响大学生英语语音能力的非语言因素研究”（13YYB008）

Testing Instruments and Assessment Methods of English Phonetics --A Review of Empirical Literature from SSCI and CSSCI Databases (2010-2016)

WEI Kehan, PEI Zhengwei

(Foreign Languages College,Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095,China)

Received:2017-08-02 Online:2018-04-20 Published:2018-04-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对2010—2016年间SSCI和CSSCI两大数据库中检索到的关于英语语音测试与评估的实证研究文献36篇进行述评，发现国内语音研究在测试手段上较为单一，国外研究所用的测试手段相对多样化，国内外研究者对语音质量评估采取了不同的方式。研究旨在推进二语语音习得领域的研究进展，为我国英语语音教学实践提供参考和借鉴。

关键词: 英语语音, 测试手段, 评估方式, 实证研究文献

Abstract: 36 empirical studies of English phonetics testing and assessment retrieved from SSCI and CSSCI databases and published from 2010 to 2016 are reviewed. It is found that the domestic studies used less diversified testing instruments than foreign ones did and both studies at home and abroad adopted different methods to assess speech quality. The findings are intended for advancing the research progress in second language phonetic acquisition and providing reference for the practice of English phonetics teaching.

Key words: English phonetics, testing instrument, assessment methods, empirical literature

魏可晗，裴正薇. 英语语音测试手段与评估方式 ——基于SSCI和CSSCI数据库实证研究文献（2010—2016）的述评[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）, 2018, 18(2): 134-139.

WEI Kehan, PEI Zhengwei. Testing Instruments and Assessment Methods of English Phonetics --A Review of Empirical Literature from SSCI and CSSCI Databases (2010-2016)[J]. , 2018, 18(2): 134-139.

参考文献

［1］李佳.英语松紧元音的听觉对比实验研究:一项基于认知语言学范畴理论的分析［J］.现代外语,2010(2):194-201.
［2］欧燕.让学生发音不绕口的绕口令:大学英语语音教学改革认知心理学实践［J］.中国外语,2014(4):61-68.
［3］裴正薇,丁言仁.音乐能力影响中国大学生英语语音能力的实证研究［J］.外语界,2013(1):36-44.
［4］CEBRIAN J,CARLET A.Secondlanguage learners identification of targetlanguage phonemes:a shortterm phonetic training study［J］.Canadian modern language review, 2014,70(4):474-499.
［5］LIN C Y,WANG M,WILLIAM I J,et al.Stress processing in mandarin and Korean second language learners of English［J］.Bilingualism language & cognition,2014,17(2):316-346.
［6］DERWING T M,MUNRO M J,FOOTE J A,et al.Opening the window on comprehensible pronunciation after 19 years:a workplace training study［J］.Language learning,2014,64(3):526-548.
［7］吴诗玉,杨枫.中国英语学习者元音感知中的“范畴合并”现象研究［J］.外语与外语教学,2016(3):75-84.
［8］DE JONG K,PARK H.Vowel epenthesis and segment identity in Korean learners of English［J］.Studies in second language acquisition,2012,34(1):127-155.
［9］BINGHADEER N A.The effects of age and input enhancement on L2 vowel production: a longitudinal study［J］.TESOL journal,2010(3):64-80.
［10］曹瑞斓.基于标记区分假设的中国EFL学习者英语音节首辅音丛产出研究［J］.外语与外语教学,2015(3):8-12.
［11］周卫京,宋会萍.中国大学生产出性英语语音素质管窥［J］.外语与外语教学,2015(3):1-7.
［12］HAN J I,HWANG J B,C T H.The acquisition of phonetic details:evidence from the production of English reduced vowels by Korean learners［J］.Second language lesearch,2011,27(4):535-557.
［13］OH G E,GUIONANDERSON S,AOYAMA K,et al.A oneyear longitudinal study of English and Japanese vowel production by Japanese adults and children in an Englishspeaking setting［J］.Journal of phonetics,2011,39(2):156-167.
［14］SAITO K,BRAJOT F.Scrutinizing the role of length of residence and age of acquisition in the interlanguage pronunciation development of English /□/ by late Japanese bilinguals［J］.Bilingualism language & cognition,2013,16(4):847-863.
［15］蒋红柳.大学英语专业学生语调学习效果探讨:语音实验案例研究［J］.中国外语,2012(2):65-71.
［16］许俊,刘正光,任.二语学习者英语韵律习得探究［J］.外语界,2013(3):31-38.
［17］童淑华.英语专业学生口语产出中音段音位的发展特征［J］.外语教学,2010(1):78-81.
［18］TROFIMOVICH P,ISAACS T,KENNEDY S,et al.Flawed selfassessment:investigating selfand otherperception of second language speech［J］.Bilingualism language & cognition,2016,19(1):122-140.
［19］薛小姣.中国英语学习者和母语者评判英语外国口音的比较研究［J］.现代外语,2016(5):647-657.
［20］李景娜,王遥.英汉本族语者对中国英语学习者的口音感知及言语理解度的对比研究［J］.外语教学理论与实践,2015(1):50-54.
［21］MUNRO M J,DERWING T M,MORTON S L.The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech［J］. Studies in second language acquisition,2006,28(1):111-132.
［22］ISAACS T,THOMSON R I.Rater experience,rating scale length,and judgments of L2 pronunciation:revisiting research conventions［J］.Language assessment quarterly,2013,10(2):135-159.
［23］ISAACS T,TROFIMOVICH P.Phonological memory,attention control,and musical ability:effects of individual differences on rater judgments of second language speech［J］.Applied psycholinguistics,2011,32(1):113-140.
［24］ISAACS T,TROFIMOVICH P.Falling on sensitive ears The influence of musical ability on extreme raters judgments of L2 pronunciation［J］.TESOL quarterly,2012,44(2):375-386.
［25］WILLIAM F,SANGWAN A,HANSEN J H L.Automatic accent assessment using phonetic mismatch and human perception［J］.IEEE transactions on audio speech & language processing,2013,21(9):1818-1829.
［26］FRANCO H,BRATT H,ROSSIER R,et al.EduSpeak:a speech recognition and pronunciation scoring toolkit for computeraided language learning applications［J］.Language testing,2010,27(3):401-418.
［27］KONIARIS C,SALVI G,ENGQALL O.On mispronunciation analysis of individual foreign speakers using auditory periphery models［J］.Speech communication,2013,55(5):691-706.
［28］伍维平.基于模糊理论的大学英语跟读测试智能评价系统研究［J］.外语电化教学,2012(4):33-38.