重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 53-63.

• 人文交通 • 上一篇    

航延险案件的疑难问题定性与纾解 ——基于保险诈骗罪新法益观视域

吴允锋,尤浩民   

  1. 华东政法大学 刑事法学院,上海 200042
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-01 修回日期:2024-06-10 发布日期:2025-08-14
  • 作者简介:吴允锋,男,华东政法大学刑事法学院教授,博士生导师;尤浩民,男,华东政法大学刑事法学院硕士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    上海市哲学社会科学规划课题“惩罚犯罪与发挥金融活力平衡下的金融诈骗罪适用范围研究”(2023BFX013)

Qualitative Analysis and Solution of Difficult Issues in Aviation Delay Insurance Cases Based on the New Legal Interest Perspective of Insurance Fraud Crime

WU Yunfeng, YOU Haomin   

  1. School of Criminal Law, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China
  • Received:2024-05-01 Revised:2024-06-10 Published:2025-08-14

摘要: 为适应保险金融市场改革,保险诈骗罪金融面向法益需明确保险市场交易秩序,保险诈骗罪与诈骗罪之间属于互斥的独立关系。在航延险案件中,行为如果符合保险诈骗罪规范构造,应当排斥适用诈骗罪。航延险的保险标的是飞机延误的事实可能给乘客造成的损失,只有在保险公司将是否乘机作为航延险的实质审查标准时,乘客伪造登机事实的行为才能被认定为虚构保险标的。对于冒用他人名义购险骗赔的实际投保人,性质上与保险合同规定的投保人无异,可以构成保险诈骗罪的主体;行为人在航班准点起飞前退票以及航班延误后索赔的行为,需要严格遵循法秩序统一性原则,民事法上效力待定的行为,刑法不能直接介入。

关键词: 航空延误险;保险诈骗罪;诈骗罪;法益;法秩序统一性

Abstract: In order to adapt to the reform of the insurance financial market, the financial aspect of insurance fraud should be clearly defined as the order of insurance market transactions. The relationship between insurance fraud and fraud is mutually exclusive and independent. In aviation extension insurance cases, if the behavior conforms to the regulatory structure of insurance fraud, the application of fraud should be excluded. The insurance subject of air delay insurance is the potential loss that may be caused to passengers due to the fact of aircraft delay. Only when the insurance company considers whether to board the plane as the substantive examination standard of air delay insurance, can the act of passengers forging the fact of boarding be recognized as a “fictitious insurance subject”. For the actual policy holder who fraudulently purchases insurance in the name of others, his nature is not different from that of the policy holder stipulated in the insurance contract, and he can constitute the subject of the crime of insurance fraud. The behavior of the actor who refunds the ticket before the scheduled departure of the flight and claims compensation after the flight delay must strictly follow the principle of unity of legal order. The criminal law cannot directly intervene in the behavior with undetermined effectiveness in civil law.

Key words: aviation delay insurance; insurance fraud crime; crime of fraud; legal interests; unification of legal order