Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University Social Sciences Edition ›› 2022, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 33-43.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Comparative Analysis of the Strategic Value of the Maritime Silk Road and the International Corridor of ChinaPakistanIranTurkey

WANG Chengfu1,2, HUANG Chengfeng2   

  1. 1.School of Management, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China; 2.School of Economics Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
  • Received:2021-06-16 Revised:2021-07-03 Online:2022-05-18 Published:2022-05-18

海上丝绸之路与中巴伊土国际通道战略价值比较

王成福1,2,黄承锋2   

  1. 1.重庆理工大学 管理学院,重庆 400054;2.重庆交通大学 经济管理学院,重庆 400074
  • 作者简介:王成福,女,重庆理工大学管理学院讲师,重庆交通大学经济管理学院博士研究生;黄承锋(通讯作者),男,重庆交通大学经济管理学院教授,博士生导师。
  • 基金资助:
    〖JP3〗国家社会科学基金重点项目“中巴伊土国际通道多边战略价值及风险评估研究”(16AGJ007);重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学规划项目“‘文化+’视域下古新丝路国际通道协同联动机制研究”(19SKGH134) 〖JP〗

Abstract: “Belt and road” initiative make land and sea coordination. The maritime silk road and the ChinaPakistanIranTurkey international corridor (CPITIC) come from sea and land respectively. The ChinaSingaporeEgyptGreece international corridor, which is of high quality as a representative passage picked up from the maritime silk road corridors, in the strategic value, is qualified and quantified from Chinas perspective in the five dimensions: the powersharing value, the geopolitical value, the economic value, the cultural value and the military value. Their comparative advantage is refined to realize the complementary advantages and integration and to better promote the coordinating strategy of Chinas land and sea.

Key words: maritime silk road, land international corridor, strategic value, military value

摘要: “一带一路”倡议,陆海统筹。海上丝绸之路与中巴伊土国际通道分别来自海洋和陆地。从海上丝绸之路中选取一条优质通道——中新埃希国际通道与中巴伊土国际通道比较,以中国为主体单国维度,对比和量化两个通道的战略价值,分别从权利分享、地缘政治、经济、文化和军事价值五个维度,定性评价和定量比较两个通道的战略价值,并提炼各自的比较优势,以期实现海陆优势互补与融会贯通,从而更好地推进我国陆海统筹战略。

关键词: 海上丝绸之路, 陆上国际通道, 战略价值, 军事价值