Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University Social Sciences Edition ›› 2023, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 26-35.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Study of Rules in Personal Information Processing A Perspective of Balance of Interests

XIE Xiao1,2   

  1. [1]中华人民共和国国家互联网信息办公室.国家互联网信息办公室有关负责人就对滴滴全球股份有限公司依法作出网络安全审查相关行政处罚的决定答记者问[EB/OL].[2022-07-21].http://www.cac.gov.cn/2022-07-21/c_1660021534364976.htm. [2]程啸.论我国个人信息保护法中的个人信息处理规则[J].清华法学,2021,15(3):55-73. [3]GARLEWICZ A.Athlete biometric data in soccer:athlete protection or athlete exploitation[J].DePaul journal of sports law,2020,6(1):6-34. [4]大数据“发力”提升运动成绩:访冬季项目运动员技能优化关键技术研究项目负责人刘宇[J].人民周刊,2022,22(2):41-43. [5]MELINDA L,MCLELLAN R B,et al.Wearable in sports:who are you betting on [J].Entertainment and sports lawyer,2019(2):3-9. [6]个人信息保护课题组.个人信息保护国际比较研究[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2021:163-165. [7]韩旭至.个人信息的法律界定及类型化研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2018:31-33. [8]孙莹.个人信息保护法条文解读与适用要点[M].北京:法律出版社,2021:13. [9]TRACOL X.Back to basics:the European court of justice further defined the concept of personal data and the scope of the right of data subjects to access it[J].Computer law & security review the international journal of technology law & practice,2015,40(1):112-119. [10]周斯佳.个人数据权与个人信息权关系的厘清[J].华东政法大学学报,2020,23(2):88-97. [11]谢远扬.信息论视角下个人信息的价值:兼对隐私权保护模式的检讨[J].清华法学,2015,9(3):94-110. [12]李建新.两岸四地的个人信息保护与行政信息公开[J].法学,2013,57(7):95-104. [13]何渊.数据法学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2020:54. [14]王鹏鹏.论个人信息区分的私法保护[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2022,43(3):92-101. [15]王利明.敏感个人信息保护的基本问题:以《民法典》和《个人信息保护法》的解释为背景[J].当代法学,2022,36(1):3-14. [16]谢琳,王漩.我国个人敏感信息的内涵与外延[J].电子知识产权,2020,30(9):4-16. [17]张新宝.从隐私到个人信息:利益再衡量的理论与制度安排[J].中国法学,2015,32(3):38-59. [18]王锡锌.个人信息权益的三层构造及保护机制[J].现代法学,2021,43(5):105-123. [19]刘新宇.中华人民共和国个人信息保护法重点解读与案例解析[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2021:11. [20]张新宝.互联网生态“守门人”个人信息保护特别义务设置研究[J].比较法研究,2021,35(3):11-24. [21]杨合庆.论个人信息保护法十大亮点[N].法治日报,2021-08-22(6). [22]孙莹.个人信息保护法条文解读与适用要点[M].北京:法律出版社,2021:16. [23]徐伟康.运动员个人数据处理中“同意”原则适用的检视[J].武汉体育学院学报,2020,62(12):40-45. [24]吕炳斌.个人信息权作为民事权利之证成:以知识产权为参照[J].中国法学,2019,36(4):44-65. [25]石佳友,刘思齐.人脸识别技术中的个人信息保护:兼论动态同意模式的建构[J].财经法学,2021,21(2):60-78. [26]程啸.论个人信息处理者的告知义务[J].上海政法学院学报(法治论丛),2021,36(5):67-80. A Study of Rules in Personal Information Processing A Perspective of Balance of Interests XIE Xiao1,2 (1.School of Law, Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072, China; 2.School of Foreign Studies, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China
  • Received:2022-07-13 Revised:2022-09-29 Online:2023-04-12 Published:2023-04-12

利益衡平视角下个人信息处理规则研究

谢潇1,2   

  1. 1.武汉大学 法学院,武汉 430072;2.湖南科技大学 外国语学院,湖南 湘潭 411201
  • 作者简介:谢潇,女,武汉大学博士研究生,湖南科技大学讲师。
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省社会科学基金项目“新媒体时代多模态普法话语的认知研究”(19YBA149)

Abstract: Personal information carries multiple interests, and its processing tends to cause conflicts of interest among individuals, organizations, society and the country. This might be attributed to unclear connotation and denotation of personal information as well as its nonstandard processing.In the processing of personal information, finding common ground for all parties in line with the value of balance of interests is an effective way to eliminate conflicts of interest.In the interpretation and application of personal information processing rules, balance of interests is the goal. On the basis of “legality, legitimacy, necessity, and integrity”, we should accurately grasp the requirements of application and exceptions to the “informed consent” rule, strengthen the protection of sensitive information, promote the use of general information, and standardize personal information processing behavior,thus achieving a dynamic balance between personal information protection and appropriateuse of information.

Key words: personal information protection law; information processing;sensitive information; informed consent;balance of interests

摘要: 个人信息承载着多重利益,在个人信息处理中,容易引发个人与组织、社会以及国家之间的多元利益冲突。个人信息的内涵和外延界定不清,个人信息处理行为不规范,是引发利益冲突的重要原因。把握利益衡平的价值理念,在个人信息处理中寻找各方利益契合点,是消除利益冲突的有效途径。在个人信息处理规则的阐释与适用中,应当以利益衡平为目标,在“合法、正当、必要、诚信”的基础上,准确把握“知情同意”规则的适用要求与例外情形,关注敏感个人信息保护,促进一般个人信息利用,规范个人信息处理行为,实现个人信息保护与信息合理利用的动态平衡。

关键词: 个人信息保护法;信息处理;敏感信息;知情同意;利益衡平